Martingale vs Fibonacci: which is better for Aviator?
Test this strategy live, free
Demo mode · 18+ · No real money
Open the full free crash game →
Round hash: …
Bet 1
Bet 1Bet 2
Strategy autoplay
- Rounds
- 0
- Wins
- 0
- Biggest multiplier
- —
- Profit / loss
- 0
- Longest losing streak
- 0
Martingale vs Fibonacci comes down to how fast each one climbs after a loss. Martingale doubles every time: ₹100, ₹200, ₹400, ₹800. Fibonacci walks up 1-1-2-3-5-8 units: ₹100, ₹100, ₹200, ₹300, ₹500. In our simulator at a 2x auto cash out, Fibonacci finished with a higher median (₹6,300 vs ₹4,600 from ₹5,000) and fewer busted sessions (31.5% vs 46.5%). If you want a recovery system, Fibonacci is the friendlier one. Both live in our Aviator game tricks toolbox.
Stakes after a losing run
₹100 units:
| Losses in a row | Martingale stake | Fibonacci stake |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | ₹100 | ₹100 |
| 2 | ₹400 | ₹200 |
| 4 | ₹1,600 | ₹500 |
| 6 | ₹6,400 | ₹1,300 |
Six losses at 2x happen about 1.9% of the time per run, and in a 100-round session that comes up a lot. By then Martingale needs more than a ₹5,000 budget.
Head to head in the simulator
1,000 sessions, 100 rounds, ₹100 units, ₹5,000, 2x, 97% RTP:
| Martingale | Fibonacci | |
|---|---|---|
| Median finish | ₹4,600 | ₹6,300 |
| Best 10% | above ₹10,200 | above ₹7,400 |
| Busted | 46.5% | 31.5% |
Martingale has the bigger best case; Fibonacci wins more sessions. Read more on each: Fibonacci strategy and d’alembert vs martingale.
Which should you pick?
- Small budget: neither; go flat betting.
- Want recovery with control: Fibonacci with a cap at 8 units.
- Want maximum drama: Martingale, with a hard cap at four doublings.
Everything compared in the best betting system for crash games.
Try both
Switch systems in the simulator below, practise in our free crash game, then play Aviator game India at one of our crash game casinos in India.
Pro tip: whichever you choose, decide your cap before round one. The cap is the strategy.
Strategy simulator
- Median final bankroll
- Unlucky (10th percentile)
- Lucky (90th percentile)
- Chance of going bust
- Median max drawdown
- Average rounds played
Example: 1000 sessions of 100 rounds, bankroll ₹5,000, base bet ₹100, target 2x, 3% edge
| Strategy | Median final bankroll | Unlucky (10th percentile) | Lucky (90th percentile) | Chance of going bust |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fibonacci | ₹6,300 | ₹0 | ₹7,400 | 31.5% |
| Fixed bet | ₹4,800 | ₹3,600 | ₹6,000 | 0.0% |
Run it a few times with different settings to find the approach that fits your bankroll and playing style.
Top crash games
Frequently asked questions
Martingale vs Fibonacci: which is better?
In our simulator at 2x, Fibonacci had a higher median finish (₹6,300 vs ₹4,600) and fewer busted sessions (31.5% vs 46.5%).
How does Martingale work?
Double your bet after every loss and reset after a win, so one win recovers the run plus one unit.
How does Fibonacci work?
Bet units from 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8... Move forward one step after a loss and back two after a win.
Which grows faster after losses?
Martingale. Six losses take it to 64 units; Fibonacci is at 13.
Do either beat the 97% RTP?
No. Both reshape your sessions; neither changes the game's return.
By Daniel Foster · Crash Game Maths & Mechanics Analyst
Daniel focuses on the mathematics and mechanics behind crash games. His reviews examine RTP disclosures, volatility, multipliers, game mechanics and the mathematical principles behind different crash titles.
Fact-checked by Alex Morgan
Published · Updated
Comments
No comments yet. Start the conversation.
