D'Alembert vs Martingale: which suits Aviator?
Test this strategy live, free
Demo mode · 18+ · No real money
Open the full free crash game →
Round hash: …
Bet 1
Bet 1Bet 2
Strategy autoplay
- Rounds
- 0
- Wins
- 0
- Biggest multiplier
- —
- Profit / loss
- 0
- Longest losing streak
- 0
D’Alembert vs Martingale is a choice between climbing slowly and climbing fast. After a loss, D’Alembert adds one unit (₹100 → ₹200 → ₹300) while Martingale doubles (₹100 → ₹200 → ₹400). D’Alembert keeps every single bet small; Martingale recovers a whole losing run with one win. In our simulator at 2x, both ran a ₹5,000 budget out in about 45% of sessions, and Martingale’s median finish was higher. The real decider is how big a single bet you’re comfortable placing. Both are in our Aviator game tricks toolbox.
Stakes after losses
₹100 units:
| Losses in a row | D’Alembert | Martingale |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ₹200 | ₹200 |
| 3 | ₹400 | ₹800 |
| 6 | ₹700 | ₹6,400 |
Head to head in the simulator
1,000 sessions, 100 rounds, ₹100 units, ₹5,000, 2x, 97% RTP:
| D’Alembert | Martingale | |
|---|---|---|
| Median finish | ₹3,100 | ₹4,600 |
| Best 10% | above ₹10,100 | above ₹10,200 |
| Busted | 44.9% | 46.5% |
| Avg rounds played | 79 | 74 |
D’Alembert’s stake drifts up slowly when losses outnumber wins, which at 48.5% win chance they slightly do. Martingale fails less often per run but harder when it does. More detail in D’Alembert strategy and martingale vs fibonacci.
Which should you pick?
- Like small bets: D’Alembert with a 5-unit cap.
- Like one-win recovery: Martingale with a four-doubling cap.
- Like long sessions: neither; try flat betting.
The full comparison is in the best betting system for crash games.
Try both
Switch systems in the simulator below, practise in our free crash game, then play Aviator game India at one of our crash game casinos in India.
Pro tip: test your cap in the simulator first and watch how the busted percentage drops.
Strategy simulator
- Median final bankroll
- Unlucky (10th percentile)
- Lucky (90th percentile)
- Chance of going bust
- Median max drawdown
- Average rounds played
Example: 1000 sessions of 100 rounds, bankroll ₹5,000, base bet ₹100, target 2x, 3% edge
| Strategy | Median final bankroll | Unlucky (10th percentile) | Lucky (90th percentile) | Chance of going bust |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Alembert | ₹3,100 | ₹0 | ₹10,100 | 44.9% |
| Fixed bet | ₹4,800 | ₹3,600 | ₹6,000 | 0.0% |
Run it a few times with different settings to find the approach that fits your bankroll and playing style.
Top crash games
Frequently asked questions
D'Alembert vs Martingale: which is better?
D'Alembert climbs much more slowly, so single bets stay small. In our simulator at 2x, both ran out of budget in about 45% of sessions, and Martingale's median finish was higher (₹4,600 vs ₹3,100).
Why is D'Alembert called safer?
Because each bet only rises by one unit, so you never face a huge single stake. Over many rounds the stake can still drift up.
How does Martingale recover losses?
One win at 2x after any run of doubled losses recovers the whole run plus one unit.
Which target suits both?
2x, close to even money.
How do I play either more safely?
Cap the stake: four doublings for Martingale, five units for D'Alembert.
By Daniel Foster · Crash Game Maths & Mechanics Analyst
Daniel focuses on the mathematics and mechanics behind crash games. His reviews examine RTP disclosures, volatility, multipliers, game mechanics and the mathematical principles behind different crash titles.
Fact-checked by Alex Morgan
Published · Updated
Comments
No comments yet. Start the conversation.
